Alpha Tech Pet, Inc. - Product Detail Binder (January 2013)

Tersano LotusPro vs. Ionized Water by Type of Item

After cleaning ATP levels were measured to compare the extent of organic reduction

Chart 6: ATP Levels for Items LotusPro vs. Ionized Water

delivered by the LotusPro and the ionized water

500.0

400.0

alternative. LotusPro ATP reductions were more effective for the items and surfaces evaluated. The organic load reduction was reduced to 30.5 for the LotusPro strategy vs. 204 for the ionized water approach

300.0

200.0

100.0

0.0

LotusPro  Ionized Water

The Table below presents the raw ATP data measured during the conduct of this study.

Ionized Water

Items

LotusPro

Banister/railing

37.0 109 9.0 109 12.5 151 12.0 129 38.5 120 23.9 278 39.5 237 11.3 436 20.2 130 53.0 237 9.0 102 100.0 407 30.5 204

Bench

Call Button

Chair Desk Door

Drinking Fountain

Sink/fixtures

Soap dispenser

Table

Toilet/fixtures

Waste container Overall Average

Overall, the data shows a 668+% reduced level of organic load for the LotusPro product compared to the ionized water cleaning alternative. OVERALL STUDY CONCLUSIONS The Tersano LotusPro device delivered achieved a respectable 92.5% average reduction in organic load for the rooms and items tested. When compared to the ionized water alternative, ATP RLU readings were over 668% higher for the ionized water approach. On the basis of the results of this study, we must conclude that the LotusPro device delivers superior organic load reductions for Room and Item surfaces. Submitted by: Vince Elliott, BS, MHS velliott@ealtd.com 410-584-8560

©1998‐2012 Elliott Affiliates, Ltd. and may not be duplicated by any means.   

www.ealtd.com 

CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION  

Page 10 of 10